The Da Vinci Code and the Last Supper

When it comes to world-famous paintings, Leonardo pappa Vines nett Supper is always on the top of the list. What is it that, even now, 500 years after its creation in 1498, makes Last Supper such a mysterious and conspiracy-laden painting? First, there is a level of mystery surrounding its creator, Leonardo Dad Vinci. Not only was Dad Vinci an important painter, he was also an engineer, sculptor, designer, and scientist. His ingenious concepts in many disciplines and technological inventions were so advanced for the 14th to 1 5th century technology that even almost 20th-century inventors, manage he Wright brothers, pulled from his work.There have been a lot of theories on Dad Vines life and on his paintings and it is believed that Last Supper contained hidden messages, which Dad Vinci encoded in the painting himself. This probe depart examine what these theories are and how they are counter argued by scholars and art historians. Although there have been many fiction bracings ab by Dad Vines Last Supper, Dan Browns novel The Dad Vinci Code, published in 2004, garnered an enormous amount of support from the world wide readers. It brought up a huge scandal on Jesus that, e and Mary Magdalene were lovers and in fact there was a child (or children) between them.In the novel, a secret group, Prior of Soon, protects the descendants of Jesus until today. Dad Vinci, as a member of Prior of Soon, was aware of the truth about Jesus and Mary so he encoded this secret in Last Supper to send out the message . The Dad Vinci Code changed some of its readers beliefs toward their religion, but scholars say this novel is merely based on fiction. In the words of Renaissance art h atomic number 53st Elizabeth Pillion, It is severely flawed. As a reader of fiction, I think it is a tremendously entertaining view . The Dad Vinci Code says that, in Dad Vines Last Supper, the visit sitting on the right side of Jesus is obviously a female person person the figure does not hav e a beard like rest of the disciples and the figures hand is placed closest to Jesus right hand, suggesting that the two are physically close. Scholars argue that there have been a lot of paintings on the subject of the Last Supper, and it had been common to depict John side by side(p) to Jesus and beardless. Disco did Boninesss Last Supper from the early 14th century portrayed John in mistakable ways.In Discos Last Supper, John is sitting on the left side of Jesus, beardless and leaning on Jesus. Domenici Grandchilds version of Last Supper also has the same description of John, in which he is sitting on the left side of Jesus, leaning on the shoulders. Why do Johns illustrations share these similarities, when all these paintings were created over a century apart from each other? The book of account has all the answers. John is known to as Jesus most beloved disciple in fact, the Bible limitedally refers to John as the disciple, the one whom Jesus loved John 202, and this phrase appears our times throughout the Gospel of John . The Bible describes the scene at the Last Supper with specific details of the position of John and Jesus It is the Beloved Disciple who, while reclining beside Jesus at the Last Supper, asks Jesus, after being requested by scratch to do so, who it is that will betray him John 1323-25. Both Disco and Garlanding were absolutely correct in terms of the position of Jesus and John according to the Bible and the appearance of John is also similar in both paintings.These three painters versions of Last Supper are not the only paintings n the same subject in fact, the earliest depiction of the last supper occurs in the frescos of the Catacomb of Rome from the 6th century . There were some conventions created when many painters drew the Last Supper over the centuries, and Leonardo Dad Vinci was simply following these conventions in accordance with both the Bible and earlier Last Supper depictions created by other painters.Dan Browns the Da d Vinci Code disregarded the facts about these traditions, withal described Leonardo Last Supper as if everything started from it therefore, the readers are biased with this faulty concept. Another argument made by Dan Brown has to do with SST. Peter, who is sitting next to the female figure. The novels interpretation of SST. Peter is that he was against the relationship between Jesus and Mary Magdalene therefore, he was illustrated showing a sign of carrying out on the female figures neck, and he is holding a knife with his right hand as a threat.The author says that Dad Vinci wouldnt have drawn these features unless they meant something, but scholars argue differently. Iconography is one of the characteristics of Renaissance arts, which includes symbolism in the paintings . Pewters holding a knife at the Last Supper is actually a Christian symbol, foreseeing of the event followed by the Last Supper. In Discos painting, it is observed that there are a lot of knives present on the table. Although Peter is not holding a knife in this painting, the knives serve as symbolism.It is more obvious in Grandchilds Last Supper, in which Peter is actually holding a knife in his right hand. Contrary to Dan Browns explanation, it does not ensure like Peter is threatening someone else. The reference to Pewters knife appears in the Bible. When Judas showed up with soldiers to arrest Jesus, Peter fought back and cut off the ear of the richly priests servant, named Mulches John 1810. By illustrating Peter with a knife in his hand, it serves as foreshadowing of a future event.It is wrong to say that, because Peter is holding a knife in the painting, it has a meaning of threatening other person, but it serves as a symbolism off future event. What appears to be Pewters showing an execution gesture on Johns neck is, in fact, a misinterpretation made by the Dad Vinci Code. As discussed above, the Bible has some specific details on the ignitions of Peter and John. It is the Belov ed Disciple who, while reclining beside Jesus at the Last Supper, asks Jesus, after being requested by Peter to do so, who it is that will betray him John 1323-25.Leonardo Dad Vines Last Supper is describing the scene of Pewters requesting John to ask Jesus. Dan Browns explanation of the gesture of Peter is misleading for its readers therefore, it is only a fictional screen background and it should not be taken seriously. Dan Brown was very clever to use Leonardo Dad Vinci as the theme of the book, and he fact that everyone loves to believe a worldwide conspiracy made the Dad Vinci Code very successful fiction novel.It is remarkable how a novel can have so untold impact on the worldwide readers views, even on religion, although this particular example shows how dangerous in can be. The readers who do not have much intimacy in art history or religious history can easily be biased with these fictional interpretations mentioned above. When reading these kinds of novels, it is the re aders responsibility to be open-minded and seek the truth themselves instead of being fully influenced by the author.