Different Leadership Skills-Free-Samples-Myassignmenthelp.com

Question: Discuss What makes a good leader? Answer: Introduction Everybody has a different opinion on the word leadership because some individuals might consider an individual as their leader who has the capability of driving away the problem is, issues difficulties and a few individuals might consider anybody as a leader who is having a charisma or who is capable of showing them the dreams of a great future (Kantharia, 2012). Similarly many people consider a person to be a leader if he is capable of making them grow by creating wise strategies for them etc. Therefore there are different ideas of a leader but there is one thing which is same in all the perspective i.e. people consider anybody to be a leader if that person appears to them as best of the best individuals (Tight, 2010). Nobody would consider an individual to be the leader who doesn't possess any knowledge of demands and desires of his team are who is not capable of bearing hardships etc. (Charteris-Black, 2007). What makes a good leader? As per my opinion, a good leader has to be one who is able to communicate and collaborate, along with inspiring individuals for working to attain the desired objectives (Wheatley, 2009). Leaders have to work closely with other people, listen to their concerns and collaborate with them so that there is a resolution and desirable outcome achieved. Therefore a leader has to be easily accessible so that anybody can reach out to him for solutions, whenever there is any kind of problem (Sadler, 2013).Leading a set of individuals needs a shared sense of trust and understanding among the leader and the team members. Being an initial step on the way to that target, leaders must be trained to connect (Price, 2004). The leader has to process one more quality which is the abilityof identifyingthe appropriate talent in the team, grooming the capabilities and skills and building successful teams. One of the examples of such capabilities is when a company is goingthrough anychange or a merger and there is a task of integrating the team (Charteris-Black, 2007).These teammembers usually have different work experiences and technical backgrounds and they might be sitting across different time zones. So in this casethe leader has to identify the strengths of every new member and assess how his capabilities, skills and qualities can match up with the team. The leader has to carry out different discussions and identify their skill sets and interests (Bhatti et al., 2012).There has to be some strategymade orassignment of work has to be done in such a manner that people are able to pick up the new skills with their work and there can be cross-training within the teams. This way integration of team can be han dled rightly by their leader and the major role of the leader is to motivate the team members and keep them informed along with the provision of support (Deschamps, 2005). The biggest drawback in the leaderis whenhe is being deceitful all makes false promises and skews the facts and information. This way a leader can lose the trust of people (Board Leadership, 2011). A good leader must be capable of communicating factually and setting the practical goals so that his team is inspired. There has been a continuous debate which can be observed in different literature and professional practices, or if the leaders are created or are born (Burns, 2012). This debate is focused on the basis that these traits which form a leader to be successful can't be taught. These skills mightinvolve motivation, great looking ethics and ambition (Johnson, Smith and Strutt, 2006). There is a perception in different literature that these skills are inherited in people who come up as leaders in the places of work. However thetraits or skills related to ambition, working ethics and motivation are not easily measured by themselves (Topalian, 2012). One example of a leader might be of Adolf Hitler who utilised basic leadership practices of transformation and followership. He could be considered as a great leader by his success of rebuilding Germany post World War I (Fitch, 2015). However after the consideration given to his total work, many of the individuals consider him to be a mark off in sult to the profession of leadership. He can be considered as a dictator but not a leader. This comes with the fact that leaders have to be ethical and moral actors. A good leader is one who is ready to serve others, selfless, humble, vice, form and processes different great qualities. There are various characteristics and skills of a great leader but a single person can't possess them all.Leadership is a trait that requires strong mind with the capability to make firm decisions (Decker, 2009). It can also be said that anybody who is capable of satisfying the basic psychological desires of his followers can also be termed as a successful leader. Leadership is the trait which can't be taken from any other person rather it can be attained through self determination of an individual. It can be best described as the personality of the extremely highest capability in terms of thinking, ruling, innovating, influencing, motivating, imagining etc. (Business analysis training helps leaders achieve an enterprise-wide perspective, 2010). The leaders can be categorised as per their work practices. For instance people linked with politics are considered to be political leaders and the leaders who are part of Armed Forces are considered to be leaders of their respective areas. Leadership is significant quality which is needed by political leaders and also by the Armed Forces because they are the ones who keep the country secured and therefore they should be capable of utilising their power and must be attentive all the time (Jillett, 2000). Another quality which is highly important for the leader is alertness and intelligence. The leader has to be alert all the time so that any fraudulent activity or wrongdoing doesn't impact him. By use of alertness and intelligence, leaders can control any difficult situation easily (Verstraeten, 2008). The leaders have to be impartial, positive and action oriented. In case of any partial for any follower, the leader loses trust and confidence of others. It is the duty of a leader to motivate and increase the standards of every follower and not only some of them. A leader has to be an optimistic person with positive attitude and he must not have negative thinking or any plans which reflect negativity. One person who shows negative behaviour can never become a leader. The leader has to be very courageous and he must show his spirits for facing the issues and resolving those rather than putting blames on others or embarrassing others (Rettberg, 2016). For being successful and attain heights, one must avoid being coward, resentment and must become bold, action-oriented and idealistic (Hakimi, Van Knippenberg and Giessner, 2010).A good leader possesses all these attributes. Rather than turning out to be a boss for the followers on the group members, a great leader is always ready to ass ist them by his experiences and help them in changing their minds and motives towards positivism. There are different traits that define a great leadership. The leader has a skill to influence, motivate individuals so that they carry out tasks in such a manner that there able to attain a common goal. Effective leaders have to perform in a ceaseless manner and communicate with individuals for motivating them efficiently. The trait theories put stress on different attributes and dates of the leaders which bring efficiency. However the trait theories were not able to set up the traits which are mutual to each leader. Every leader has different characteristics and as per this theory there are specific characteristics which might be helpful for leaders to be more effective, like charisma, knowledge, trust, confidence etc. depending totally on these traits might not always be useful for motivating the team members in retaining the stated objectives. The other set of leadership theories are behavioral theories which are useful in identifying particular behaviors of leaders that can be helpful in being successful. The leaders might show people-oriented or task-oriented attitude and might take decisions on different styles like authoritarian, laissez faire or, democratic styles. But these theories also ignore the situation aspects and environmental aspects therefore contingency theories are preferred. Contingency theories showed that the fitness of leadership is linked with interplaying of different attitudes, traits, behaviors and environmental factors. Therefore these are the best theories which can be applied to different situations. As per the situation model it is suggested that leadership style must be as per the maturity level of the team members. Therefore the later is free to choose any of the styles from telling, selling, participation, delegating. This different style is very because when the leader has to deal with new entrants in the business then they prefer to apply the telling style and informed them rightly what has to be done and how it is to be done. The leader would also need to apply the delegating approach when he interacts with the team members. Path-Goal model shows that a leader can influence the performance and motivation of the group by providing with the rewards for attaining the performance objectives and making clear path with the removal of any hindrances. Similarly when the leader practices his leadership with knowledge workers then transformational leadership style is the best approach where in the followers and leaders can take one another to the next level of motivating and attacks The leader I could be By carrying out different online tests for revealing the effectiveness as leader, I could assist that there are different rates which leaders need. There are two major areas of personal development which can help in making a great leader which are positive attitude and self-confidence. X in case one is optimistic and has purchase an attitude then he is capable of making the best from all situations and he can easily motivate others to perform at their best. Similarly a self-confident leader is one who can inspire others. I can be self-confident by mastering Key skills and situations and my understanding that one can bring more value by working. One of the best approaches for improving the confidence is to be aware of everything that one has already attained.] Similarly a positive frame of mind is also linked with great leadership. It is important that there is a strong sense of balance Developed and recognised which helps in recognising the issues and hindrances and helps in dealing with the issues in a positive way. The people who are positive in nature have a realistic approach towards different situations and they are ready to bring changes for overcoming issues. I can be a great leader by using stress management techniques, relaxation and exercising therapies which are useful for getting rid of negative feelings. Also, it is the utilisation of the emotional intelligence that is "soft skills", "character" and "communication skills". By emotional intelligence the better understanding of a particular type of human talent is provided and it is the capacity of recognising the feelings of the individual and of other people. It assists in managing the emotions for creating strong relations. I also undertook the VARK test which provided with an insight into the predisposition for a specific learning style. There are different learning styles which dominate an individual and there are different styles which are tertiary, secondary or least preferred ones. Since the learning styles change with time, therefore this test can be undertaken on a regular basis because it shows a personal self-assessment of liked learning mortality. Looking at this kind of test and I could see that most of the team members prefer visual learning and others preferred Kinaesthetic learning thus the leadership approach has to be changed as per the situation. For becoming a great later I have to keep in mind that my actions always set the tone for whatever it issuitableattribute at the place of work. I have to always show directions which I prefer my team to replicate. I was so set of rules for behaviourand expectationsfor the way in which the team members must behave at the workplace. There are various actions which are not tolerated at the workplace. In myopinionthe best approach of encouraging this particular set of actions is to rightly show these behaviours Meissen Being humble is also one of thekeywhere the credit of successful projects is shared with theteam members. In case of any mistake, I usually admit to the same and in case there is a need for apologising then the same can be done. By such admittance of mistakes, and the workers generally feel safe when they have to admit their faults ratherthenusing any "blame game court. By the acceptance that individuals can be at fault, there can be a great atmosphere created at the workplace. For practising effective communication I can let my teamtoknow that they are open to discuss the workplace problems with me and forthisI need to be approachable. It is important that team members are given attention and I keep an open mind while listening to them. It is necessary that the conversation is kept confidential therefore trust can be built in this manner. It is also important that the staff members are aware of the expectations of the leader and the misunderstandings are quickly addressed. To decrease the misunderstandings it is important that there is effective communication and whatever has been discussed is email to the team member, if needed. Confidentleader is one who knows that there is always additional to be learnt and who seeks advice from anybody who is more experienced. It is important that the leader takes feedback from the team members, mentor and peer group. Looking at the different leadership stories, I could be a situational leadership because I feel that it is important to act as per the situations and one approach or style is not suitable to all circumstances. Each leader hasparticularstyle of dealing with individuals. Therefore it is important that I take help of my mentor is in identifying the strengths and weaknesses and get feedback from the team membersashow they live my management style. Since a single style cannot be applied to differentsituations thereforeI can take a lookondifferent leaders of the past and the causes of their success or failure. It is important that the leadership style doesn't need to be same as any previous leader of the business rather it should be the real one. Autocratic style is something that I would not like to be because I don't want to be control freak and being disliked by the subordinates. The autocratic leadership style can be highly useful in case of crisis especially in the need of fast decisions. It is also useful in case of routine processes and jobs that require unskilled workers (Blank, 2011). This leadership style is not my preferred style because it suppresses the creativity and permits the leader in excessive control and abusive of the power. I would rather prefer the bureaucratic style where I would follow the principles and useful for dealing with highly technical workers. This find leadership would be useful in preventing any kind of conflict in ideas with the team members since only the documented principles and rules have to be followed. However this style should not be uploaded every time because the creativity and innovation might get suppressed (Axelrod and Coyle, 2011). Laissez Faire style is better than the previous two sides because in this I would be able to love my subordinates to work on their own and there can be some recommendations provided with the information regarding the deadlines to be achieved. This kind of leadership would be effective when the workers are highly capable and great experience in data. This way the workers and teammates would be capable of doing the task on their own. In case the workers and on skilled and experienced then this styles would not be suitable. The most suitable style is the democratic approach which permits the perfect balance of authority of the later and involvement of team members. This is a collaborative style where in the leaders and teammates work together towards accomplishment of the predefined goals. It is the responsibility of a leader to make sure that the team members stay motivated and the business goals are achieved. For this it is important to Study the place of her and assess which kind of leadership style is most appropriate so that everybody works at the optimal level (Axelrod and Coyle, 2011). There's further to leadership than possessing a high-ranking designation and being in charge of a team. The managers might be authorized to tell individuals what to do, however if a manager is an ineffective leader, he won't be capable of guiding and motivating his team to achieve business objectives (Ingham and Feldman, 2009). The most excellent leaders correspond frequently and are clear in delivery of thoughts. The most excellent leaders also adapt communications to best suit the circumstances and the receiver. This means they take the time to understand which communication style is favoured by every team member (e.g. are they a manuscript individual, email, telephone, or personal communicator?) Moreover theyre good listeners and genuinely pay attention to other individuals (Singh, 2015). Conclusion Ultimately, a superior leader has to be devoted to his group members and practices. This consecutively, will lead to a feeling of assurance amongst the followers. Having trust in self capabilities and the people around him/her, the leader gets inspired and motivates other people in the process too. With a high level of understanding one might embark on a personal development plan for moving toward the objective of being an exceptional leader by building up some of the average strengths to the uppermost levels (Osborne, 2010.). It is important for the leaders to initiate to form a personal development plan with the clear goal of becoming a superior leader. But without any plan, one is dependent on fortune and situation to make oneself more efficient. References Axelrod, W. and Coyle, J. (2011). Make talent your business.Leader to Leader, 2011(62), pp.11-16. Bhatti, N., Maitlo, G., Shaikh, N., Hashmi, M. and Shaikh, F. (2012). The Impact of Autocratic and Democratic Leadership Style on Job Satisfaction.International Business Research, 5(2). Blank, W. (2011).The 108 skills of natural born leaders. New York: AMACOM. Board Leadership. (2011).Board Leadership, 2001(58), pp.1-8. Burns, J. (2012).Leadership. New York, NY: Open Road Integrated Media. Business analysis training helps leaders achieve an enterprise-wide perspective. (2010).Leader to Leader, 2010(58), pp.63-64. Charteris-Black, J. (2007).The communication of leadership. London: Routledge. Decker, B. (2009).Communication skills for leaders. [United States]: Axzo Press. Deschamps, J. (2005). Different leadership skills for different innovation strategies.Strategy Leadership, 33(5), pp.31-38. Fitch, B. (2015). Conflict Management: Strategies and Skills for Law Enforcement Leaders.Law Enforcement Executive Forum, 15(3). Hakimi, N., Van Knippenberg, D. and Giessner, S. (2010). Leader Empowering Behaviour: The Leader's Perspective.British Journal of Management, 21(3), pp.701-716. Ingham, J. and Feldman, L. (2009).Contemporary American business leaders. New York: Greenwood Press. Jillett, R. (2000).Business leader briefings. Harlow: Longman. Johnson, C., Smith, T. and Strutt, P. (2006).Market leader. Harlow: Longman. Kantharia, B. (2012). Servant Leadership: An Imperative Leadership Style for Leader Managers.SSRN Electronic Journal. Osborne, C. (2010.).Leadership. Price, L. (2004). Individual Differences in Learning: Cognitive control, cognitive style, and learning style.Educational Psychology, 24(5), pp.681-698. Rettberg, A. (2016). Need, creed, and greed: Understanding why business leaders focus on issues of peace.Business Horizons, 59(5), pp.481-492. Sadler, P. (2013).Leadership. London: Kogan Page Ltd. Singh, P. (2015). Leaders Lacking Emotional Intelligence: Towards A Theory Of Tobephobic Leaders.Journal of Applied Business Research (JABR), 31(3), p.1179. Tight, D. (2010). Perceptual Learning Style Matching and L2 Vocabulary Acquisition.Language Learning, 60(4), pp.792-833. Topalian, A. (2012). Frontline Roles for Design Leaders in the Multiverses of Business.Design Management Journal, 7(1), pp.29-39. Verstraeten, J. (2008). From Business Ethics to the Vocation of Business Leaders to Humanize the World of Business.Business Ethics: A European Review, 7(2), pp.111-124. Wheatley, M. (2009). When complex systems fail: New roles for leaders.Leader to Leader, 1999(11), pp.28-34.